In this analysis (actual RSS.SCP file), after running a reference simulation, each parameter
      is perturbed and another analysis is run. For each measurement
      vector, the difference between the reference and the perturbed
      result is saved. This results in a number of simulations equal
      to the number of parameters that have tolerances. We then square
      the sensitivities of each measurement and sum them for each parameter.
      The square root of the result is saved in plot called "rss".
      Mathematically, the result for a single measurement is
      Vresult = sqrt( S ( Vresult(param) - Vresult(nominal) )^2 )
      The RSS results are printed to the IsSpice4
      output file in a format that can be read back in by SpiceNet.
      You can set the measurement test limits by expanding the measurements
      to "pass with symmetry" in the Results dialog; as shown
      below.
      
      If the result is linearly proportional
      to the change in the parameter value, then the RSS result is
      proportional to the standard deviation which we could obtain
      from a statistical analysis. As a matter of convention, each
      tolerance is taken as the 3 sigma value, or 3 standard deviations
      and we report the RSS results as though they were also 3 sigma.
      The parameter perturbation is set to 1 sigma, a compromise between
      a negligibly small value and the entire tolerance band. Making
      the perturbation fairly large eliminates some errors due to local
      maximum values occurring nearby. You can change this variation
      by editing the RSS Simulation Template.
      For many circuits, the variation of
      a measurement with respect to some parameters is highly nonlinear
      so that this analysis will give incorrect results, frequently
      reporting smaller measurement variations than would be found
      using a statistical analysis.
      When performing an AC analysis, it is frequently
      assumed that the response at each frequency can be considered
      independently. Unfortunately, this is a poor assumption because
      single frequency results have an ambiguity in phase. When the
      difference in phase between 2 simulations is taken, there can
      be dramatically different results if one analysis is in a different
      phase plane than the reference simulation. Because of this, it
      is necessary to phase extend
      the vectors we wish to measure. This makes the AC analysis
      similar to the transient analysis, requiring measurements that
      resolve to scalar values. The duality between frequency and time
      seen using the Fourier transform should make this obvious.